Product Managers make spreadsheets for everything
A friend (who is a great product manager) sent me a note last week.
He told me he had spent hours trying to find the right financial advisor for his family. Not casually browsing. Not asking one friend for a referral and moving on. Really trying to make a thoughtful decision.
He had built a spreadsheet.
In that spreadsheet, he compared firms across questions like:
- What would this cost each year?
- How would fees change at different portfolio sizes?
- Could the advisor help with tax-efficient withdrawals?
- Was there a dedicated person he trusted?
- Was there a broader organization or backup person behind that advisor?
- Could they help with career planning and retirement tradeoffs?
- Could they advise on private investments?
- Could they help with life planning, not just portfolio management?
- Did he trust their judgment?
- How did they evaluate his current portfolio?
- What did they think about his retirement plan and next steps?
He considered a wide range of options: doing it himself, large national firms, custodial platforms, digital advice models, flat-fee planners, and independent wealth managers.
Eventually, he chose a firm and has been happy with the decision.
That is a good outcome. But the process says a lot about what is still hard.
The hard part is not finding names
There are plenty of ways to find financial advisors.
You can ask friends. You can search online. You can browse directories. You can look at large national firms, local RIAs, banks, brokerages, flat-fee planners, and digital advice providers.
The hard part is not finding names.
The hard part is knowing who actually fits your life.
That is where consumers often get stuck.
A credential tells you something. A firm brand tells you something. A referral tells you something. A fee schedule tells you something. But none of those alone answers the deeper question:
Is this the right advisor for me?
Consumers are trying to answer more than one question
When people look for an advisor, they are often trying to answer several questions at once. They want to know whether:
- They are paying a fair price.
- The advisor understands their situation.
- They will get help with taxes, withdrawals, equity compensation, retirement timing, estate planning, insurance, charitable giving, business ownership, private investments, or other questions that may not fit neatly into a standard profile.
- They will work with a person they trust.
- There is an organization behind that person.
- The advisor will help them think clearly about life decisions, not just investment allocation.
And often, they want to know whether they are already on the right path.
Those are not simple search filters. They are fit questions.
The best advisors are not interchangeable
One reason this process is so hard is that the best advisors are not interchangeable.
Some are great with founders and executives. Some are great with retirees. Some specialize in divorce, inheritance, physicians, business owners, families with special needs planning, cross-border issues, concentrated stock, or tax-aware retirement income.
Some are portfolio specialists. Some are planning-first. Some are strongest as coaches, educators, or long-term thinking partners. Some work best with clients who want to delegate. Others work best with clients who want to stay deeply involved.
A consumer may not know how to describe what they need. An advisor may not be easy to discover for what they do best.
That is the gap.
A spreadsheet should not be required
I admire my friend’s process. It was thoughtful, organized, and rigorous.
But most people are not going to build that spreadsheet.
Even fewer will know what columns to include.
And even if they do, many of the most important answers are difficult to evaluate before you speak with an advisor:
- What does “trust their judgment” really mean?
- How do you compare one advisor’s retirement advice with another’s?
- How do you know whether a firm’s planning process will actually fit your family?
- How do you weigh cost against service, specialization, and peace of mind?
These are the kinds of questions that should be easier to navigate.
What we are building at Warmer
At Warmer, we are building for people like my friend.
People who are thoughtful. People who want to make a good decision. People who know the choice matters, but do not want to spend hours assembling a private research project just to understand their options.
Our goal is to make advisor discovery, evaluation, comparison, and matching more specific and useful.
That means helping consumers understand what kind of advisor they may need. It means surfacing advisors based on fit, not just brand, location, or generic credentials. It means making the differences between advisors easier to see. And it means helping people move from uncertainty to a more confident first conversation.
The long-term vision is a world where every distinctive advisor can be discovered for what they actually do best — and every consumer can find an advisor who fits their goals, preferences, life, and stage of decision-making.
Finding the right advisor should be thoughtful.
It should not have to be exhausting.